Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 2;16(13):2334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132334

Table 4.

Summary descriptive statistics of participant responses to the scales from the PIPPI a (n = 344) project used to assess construct validity.

Construct Validity Items Mean SD or n (%)
Overall work ability 8 SD 1.4
Work ability in the physical domain
Very poor 72 21%
Poor 157 46%
Fairly good 100 29%
Good 15 4%
Very good 0 0%
Work ability in the psychological domain
Very poor 56 16%
Poor 155 45%
Fairly good 47 14%
Good 24 7%
Very good 1 0.3%
Feeling recovered on awaking
At no time 8 2%
Rarely 103 30%
Some of the time 153 45%
Most of the time 60 17%
All of the time 20 6%
Feeling calm and relaxed
At no time 14 4%
Rarely 144 42%
Some of the time 95 28%
Often 59 17%
Most of the time 23 7 %
All of the time 9 3%
Physical exertion at work 6 SD 2.3
Days of inhibiting pain
0–10 287 85%
11–20 27 8%
>20 24 7%

a Participants were involved primarily with work in the Danish manufacturing industry.