TABLE 3.
ROM Between Involved and Contralateral Shoulders Before Interventiona
| SSNB + IAI | IAI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Involved | Contralateral | P Value | Involved | Contralateral | P Value | |
| FF | 121.46 ± 22.31 | 159.79 ± 10.20 | <.001 | 126.85 ± 23.05 | 163.70 ± 8.96 | <.001 |
| ER | 33.33 ± 13.26 | 63.12 ± 17.03 | <.001 | 35.00 ± 15.14 | 67.22 ± 10.88 | <.001 |
| IR | 4.67 ± 3.19 | 11.37 ± 1.99 | <.001 | 5.09 ± 3.67 | 12.18 ± 1.86 | <.001 |
| ABD | 102.50 ± 29.21 | 157.50 ± 15.64 | <.001 | 112.41 ± 32.44 | 163.33 ± 8.01 | <.001 |
aValues are presented as mean ± SD. There were significant differences between the involved and contralateral shoulders on all ROM parameters (P < .05). ABD, abduction; ER, external rotation; FF, forward flexion; IAI, intra-articular corticosteroid injection; IR, internal rotation; ROM, range of motion; SSNB, suprascapular nerve block.