Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 17;10:1602. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01602

Box 2.

Structure-function considerations in antiviral antibodies that may confer protection*.

“Fc-independent” Ab-binding is sufficient. Fe serves only half-life and valency “Fc-dependent” Ab-binding is necessary but insufficient. Fe is required for one or more functions
• “Neutralization” i.e., Abs that act solely as antagonists of viral binding, entry, or launch as in many common assays
Aggregation of virions to functionally suppress numbers of infectious units.
Antagonism of viral assembly, e.g., competitive inhibitors of trimmer formations or required cleavages.
Antagonism of viral release processes, e.g., anti-neuraminidase
Antagonism of viral “virulence factors” that otherwise exacerbate disease, promote intercellular spread, or aid transmission
Opsonization: Abs that exploit FeR to redirect infectious virions to insusceptible cells, e.g., neutrophils.
Cell-targeting antibodies (CTAb) that require Fe receptor (FeR) interaction for manifestation of antiviral effect.
- ADCC as measured (17) for example by: direct lysis of infected cells; trogocytosis (RFADCC); phagocytosis; granzyme release/signaling by NK
- Complement activation: lytic cascade; other pleotropic effects of partial complement activation
• many other potential interactions
*

See Box 1 for meaning of the term “Protection” in this manuscript. For discussions and additional references on these phenomena, refer to past reviews (4, 5).