Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 17;15(3):168–182. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.160

Table 1 |.

Cohort sizes and time to publication, and clinical implications of selected phase III trials

Treatment approach Number of patients* Number of centres Start of accrual Accrual duration (months) Months from start of accrual to publication Supported changes in clinical practice? Ref.
High-risk localized disease
RTOG 0521 (RTfollowed by ADT ± docetaxel) 282 vs 281 12§ December 2005 43.6 113.1 No 23
GETUG12 (ADT ± docetaxel + estramustine followed by RP/RTfollowed by ADT) 207 vs 206 26 November 2002 48.8 149.2 No 21
TAX - 3501(RP followed by ADT ± docetaxel) 70 vs 68 108 December 2005 20.8 91.6 No 69
SWOG S9921 (RP followed by ADT ± mitoxantrone) 480 vs 481 NR October 1999 86.2 206.3 No 24
Locally-advanced disease
RT ± GnRH 987 vs 992 212 October 1994 77.4 199.8 Yes 108
ADT ± RT 603 vs 602 78 March 1995 124.0 189.8 Yes 109
ADT ± RT 436 vs 439 47 February 1996 81.3 153.2 Yes 18
Biochemically recurrent disease
Salvage RT ± anti-androgen 384 vs 376 19§ March 1998 59.5 225.2 Yes 34
Metastatic castration-sensitive disease
Intergroup (intermittent versus continuous ADT) 770 vs 765 18§ May 1995 158.7 213.3 No 66
Bilateral orchiectomytflutamide (Ml) 667 vs 669 9§ December 1989 56.5 105.4 No 37
GETUG 15 (ADT ± docetaxel) 192 vs 193 29§ October 2004 50.0 97.9 No 49,50
CHAARTED (ADT ± docetaxel) 397 vs 393 15§ July 2006 76.4 108.7 Yes 44–46
STAMPEDE (ADT ± docetaxel) 727 vs 1,090 125 October 2005 89.1 121.5 Yes 47,48
LATITUDE (ADT ± abiraterone) 597 vs 602 235 February 2013 21.8 31.2 Yes 51
STAMPEDE (ADT ± abiraterone) 500 vs 502 116 November 2011 25.9 66.1 Yes 52

ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; GnRH, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone; NR, not reported; RP, radical prostatectomy; RT, radiotherapy.

*

First number represents the number of patients assigned to the experimental arm, followed by the number assigned to the control arm.

Refers to study results that lead to incorporation within National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.

§

Estimated, based upon number of investigators.