TABLE 7.
Average marginal effects.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
| Job position (manager) | 0.102∗∗∗ | 0.083∗∗ | 0.060 | 0.058 |
| Firm size 51–250 | 0.088 | 0.084 | 0.095 | 0.097 |
| Firm size 251–1000 | –0.026 | 0.001 | 0.025 | 0.024 |
| Firm size > 1000 | –0.029 | –0.007 | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Location (North) | –0.020 | –0.028 | –0.032 | –0.035 |
| Age 35–44 | –0.006 | –0.015 | –0.010 | –0.008 |
| Age 45–54 | –0.141∗∗ | –0.123∗∗ | –0.116∗∗ | –0.114∗∗ |
| Age > 54 | –0.032 | –0.027 | –0.022 | –0.019 |
| Tenure ≤ 5 | 0.053 | 0.049 | 0.054 | 0.052 |
| Tenure > 10 | –0.008 | –0.008 | –0.008 | –0.011 |
| Education_low | 0.072* | 0.054 | 0.053 | 0.056 |
| Education_medium | –0.033 | –0.065 | –0.065 | –0.065 |
| R&S | –0.016 | –0.016 | –0.031 | –0.027 |
| Manufacturing sectors | 0.029 | 0.035 | 0.025 | 0.023 |
| Sectors with the potential to become digitalized | –0.025 | –0.019 | –0.017 | –0.015 |
| Digitalized sectors | –0.076 | –0.065 | –0.066 | –0.067 |
| Multinational firm | –0.031 | –0.036 | –0.050 | –0.050 |
| Gender | –0.038 | –0.033 | –0.024 | –0.023 |
| Formal performance appraisal | –0.089∗∗ | –0.102∗∗ | –0.098∗∗ | |
| Result-oriented appraisal | 0.124∗∗∗ | 0.070* | 0.081∗∗ | |
| Exhibited skill-oriented appraisal | 0.089∗∗∗ | 0.082∗∗ | 0.079∗∗ | |
| New competence-oriented appraisal | 0.152∗∗∗ | 0.123∗∗∗ | 0.138∗∗∗ | |
| Employees’ involvement in goal setting | 0.178∗∗∗ | 0.174∗∗∗ | ||
| Employees’ involvement in goal setting × result-oriented appraisal | 0.097 | |||
| Employees’ involvement in goal setting × exhibited skill-oriented appraisal | 0.029 | |||
| Employees’ involvement in goal setting × new competence-oriented appraisal | –0.126 | |||
| Observations | 865 | 865 | 865 | 865 |
| Mean VIF | 2.70 | 2.77 | 2.78 | 2.62 |
| AUC | 0.6226 | 0.6568 | 0.6816 | 0.6865 |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.0330 | 0.0566 | 0.0785 | 0.0816 |
| Log likelihood | -579.2 | -565.1 | -552.0 | -550.1 |
∗∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗p < 0.05, *p < 0.10.