Pauls 1996.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | RCT | |
| Participants | Very low birth weight (< 1500 g) infants | |
| Interventions | Empirical use of partially hydrolysed whey‐casein formula* (n = 25) Non‐hydrolysed protein formula* (n = 25) |
|
| Outcomes | Mean gastric residual volume (% of intake) Time to full enteral feeds Necrotising enterocolitis |
|
| Notes | Kinderklinik, Freie Universitat Berlin, Germany Trial date: early 1990s Reported as an abstract only * Energy content of both formulas: 80 kcal/100 mL; protein content: hydrolysed formula 2.9 g/100 mL vs non‐hydrolysed formula 2.7 g/100 mL |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information ‐ only abstract available |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information ‐ only abstract available |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unlikely to be blinded |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unlikely to be blinded |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcomes reported for all participants |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Protocol not available |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Funder: not stated |