Riezzo 2001.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | RCT | |
| Participants | Preterm infants (n = 36) | |
| Interventions | Partially hydrolysed casein preterm formula* (n = 18) Standard (whey‐casein) formula* (n = 18) |
|
| Outcomes | Proportion of infants who had > 1 episode of regurgitation or vomiting per day | |
| Notes | Department of Pediatrics, Neonatology Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy Trial date: 2000 Energy content of hydrolysed formula (80 kcal/100 mL) higher than control standard term formula (68 kcal/100 mL). Because trial did not report growth rates (the reason for specifying similar energy levels in comparison formulas), we made a consensus decision to include the trial |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear evidence provided ‐ stated only that infants were randomly assigned |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear evidence provided ‐ stated only that infants were randomly assigned |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All infants assessed for primary outcomes |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Protocol not available |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Funder: not stated |