Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 24;2019(7):CD012412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012412.pub3

Maggio 2005.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants Preterm infants (≤ 34 weeks' gestational age, ≤ 1750 g at birth)
Interventions Empirical use of partially hydrolysed whey‐based formula* (n = 10)
Conventional preterm formula* (n = 11)
Outcomes Growth rates from inclusion until hospital discharge
Feed intolerance (no infants had enteral feeds interrupted)
Notes Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
Trial dates: 1998 to 2000
* Energy content of both formulas: 75 kcal/100 mL
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised schedule generated ‐ not specified how
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed opaque envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Study and control formulas identical in colour and smell
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Study and control formulas identical in colour and smell
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Outcomes reported for all participants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol not available
Other bias Unclear risk Funded by Humana (manufacturer of the trial formula)