Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2016 Sep 21;59(6):703–709. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.07.018

Table 4.

Main effects and interactions of study arm, age group (adolescent 18–19 years vs. young adults 20–25 years), and parity (nulliparous vs. parous) on LARC initiation

Initiated LARC (n = 1,478)
Model 1: main effects Model 2: interaction
(intervention by adolescent)
Model 3: interaction
(intervention by
nulliparous)



aHR [95% CI] aHR [95% CI] aHR [95% CI]
Intervention 1.45 [1.03–2.03]* 1.44 [1.00–2.08]* 1.29 [.83–2.01]
Age group
 Adolescent (18–19 years) .94 [.69–1.27] .93 [.56–1.54] .94 [.69–1.27]
Intervention by adolescent interaction 1.01 [.54–1.89]
Parity
 Nulliparous .65 [.48–.90]** .65 [.48–.90]** .58 [.38–.90]*
Intervention by nulliparous interaction 1.22 [.73–2.03]
*

p ≤ .05;

**

p ≤ .01.

Models also include race/ethnicity, multiple sexual partners, insurance status, pregnancy intentions, LARC use prior to study enrollment, practice setting, and family planning Medicaid expansion.

CI = confidence interval.