Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2010 Apr 16;33(6):E87–E93. doi: 10.1002/clc.20628

The Prognostic Importance of Isolated P‐Wave Abnormalities

Amir Kaykha 1,✉, Jonathan Myers 2, Kenneth B Desser 1, Nathan Laufer 1, Victor F Froelicher 2
PMCID: PMC6653767  PMID: 20552614

Abstract

Background

While certain P‐Wave morphologies have been associated with abnormal atrial size and either pulmonary or cardiovascular (CV) disease, their relationship to mortality and specific cause of death has not been reported.

Methods

Analyses were performed on the first digitally recorded electrocardiogram (ECG) on 43 903 patients at the Palo Alto Veterans Administration Medical Center since 1987. After appropriate exclusions, 40 020 patients remained. Using computerized algorithms, P‐wave amplitude and duration in 12 leads as well as several standardized ECG interpretations were extracted. The main outcome measures were pulmonary and CV mortality.

Results

During a mean follow‐up of 6 years there were 3417 CV and 1213 pulmonary deaths. After adjusting for age and heart rate in a Cox regression model, P‐wave amplitude in the inferior leads was the strongest predictor of pulmonary death (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3–3.9, P < .0001 for an amplitude > 2.5 mm), outperforming all other ECG criteria. The depth of P‐wave inversion in leads V1 or V2 and P‐wave duration were strong predictors of CV death (HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.5–2.0, P < 0.0001 for a P‐wave inversion deeper than 1 mm), outperforming many previously established ECG predictors of CV death.

Conclusions

P‐wave amplitude in the inferior leads is the strongest independent predictor of pulmonary death while P‐wave duration and the depth of P‐wave inversion in leads V1 or V2 significantly predict CV death. These measurements can be obtained easily and should be considered as part of clinical risk stratification. Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (507.3 KB).

References

  • 1. Reeves WC, Hallahan W, Schwiter EJ, et al. Two‐dimensional echocardiographic assessment of electrocardiographic criteria for right atrial enlargement. Circulation 1981; 64(2): 387–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kaplan JD, Evans GT Jr, Foster E, et al. Evaluation of electro‐ cardiographic criteria for right atrial enlargement by quantitative two‐dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23(3): 747–752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chirife R, Feitosa GS, Frankl WS. Electrocardiographic detection of left atrial enlargement: correlation of P‐wave with left atrial dimension by echocardiography. Br Heart J 1975; 37(12): 1281–1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hazen MS, Marwick TH, Underwood DA. Diagnostic accuracy of the resting electrocardiogram in detection and estimation of left atrial enlargement: an echocardiographic correlation of 551 patients. Am Heart J 1991; 122(3 pt 1): 823–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Munuswamy K, Alpert MA, Martin RH, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of commonly used criteria for left atrial enlargement determined by M‐mode echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53(6): 829–832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Human GP, Snyman HW. The value of the Macruz index in the diagnosis of atrial enlargement. Circulation 1963; 27: 935–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Morris JJ Jr, Estes EH Jr, Whalen RE, et al. P‐wave analysis in valvular heart disease. Circulation 1964; 29: 242–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mehta A, Jain AC, Mehta MC, et al. Usefulness of left atrial abnormality for predicting left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of left bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85(3): 354–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ariyarajah V, Mercado K, Apiyasawat S, et al. Correlation of left atrial size with P‐wave duration in interatrial block. Chest 2005; 128(4): 2615–2618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dilaveris PE, Gialafos EJ, Sideris SK, et al. Simple electrocardiographic markers for the prediction of paroxysmal idiopathic atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 1998; 135(5 pt 1): 733–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Baljepally R, Spodick DH. Electrocardiographic screening for emphysema: the frontal plane P axis. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22(3): 226–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Incalzi RA, Fuso L, De Rosa M, et al. Electrocardiographic signs of chronic cor pulmonale: a negative prognostic finding in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Circulation 1999; 99(12): 1600–1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Oswald‐Mammosser M, Oswald T, Nyankiye E, et al. Non‐invasive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, comparison of ECG, radiological measurements, echocardiography and myocardial scintigraphy. Eur J Respir Dis 1987; 71(5): 419–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Daniel KR, Courtney DM, Kline JA. Assessment of cardiac stress from massive pulmonary embolism with 12‐lead ECG. Chest 2001; 120(2): 474–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Perkiomaki JS, Zareba W, Greenberg HM, et al; Thrombogenic Factors and Recurrent Coronary Events Investigators. Usefulness of standard electrocardiographic parameters for predicting cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction during modern treatment era. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90(3): 205–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bossone E, Paciocco G, Iarussi D, et al. The prognostic role of the ECG in primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest 2002; 121(2): 513–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Traver GA, Cline MG, Burrows B. Predictors of mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a 15 year follow‐up study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979; 119(6): 895–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Yue P, Atwood JE, Froelicher V. Watch the P‐wave: it can change. Chest 2003; 124(2): 424–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Asad N, Johnson VM, Spodick DH. Acute right atrial strain: regression in normal as well as abnormal P‐wave amplitudes with treatment of obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest 2003; 124(2): 560–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gelb AF, Lyons HA, Fairshter RD, et al. P pulmonale in status asthmaticus. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1979; 64(1): 18–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Song J, Kalus JS, Caron MF, et al. Effect of diuresis on P‐wave duration and dispersion. Pharmacotherapy 2002; 22(5): 564–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Carilli AD, Denson LJ, Timmapuri N. Electrocardiographic estimate of pulmonary impairment in chronic obstructive lung disease. Chest 1973; 63(4): 483–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Sapin PM, Koch G, Blauwet MB, et al. Identification of false positive exercise tests with use of electrocardiographic criteria: a possible role for atrial repolarization waves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18(1): 127–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hsieh BP, Pham MX, Froelicher VF. Prognostic value of electro‐ cardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 2005; 150(1): 161–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Macruz R, Perloff JK, Case RB. A method for the electro‐ cardiographic recognition of atrial enlargement. Circulation 1958; 17(5): 882–889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Bayés de Luna A, Cladellas M, Oter R, et al. Interatrial conduction block and retrograde activation of the left atrium and paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Eur Heart J 1988; 9(10): 1112–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Leier CV, Meacham JA, Schaal SF. Prolonged atrial conduction. A major predisposing factor for the development of atrial flutter. Circulation 1978; 57(2): 213–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Agarwal YK, Aronow WS, Levy JA, et al. Association of interatrial block with the development of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91(7): 882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jairath UC, Spodick DH. Exceptional prevalence of interatrial block in a general hospital population. Clin Cardiol 2001; 24(8): 548–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Asad N, Spodick DH. Prevalence of interatrial block in a general hospital population. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91(5): 609–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ramsaran EK, Spodick DH. Electromechanical delay in the left atrium as a consequence of interatrial block. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77(12): 1132–1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Goyal SB, Spodick DH. Electromechanical dysfunction of the left atrium associated with interatrial block. Am Heart J 2001; 142(5): 823–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lorbar M, Levrault R, Phadke JG, et al. Interatrial block as a predictor of embolic stroke. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95(5): 667–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ariyarajah V, Puri P, Spodick DH. Clinician underappreciation of interatrial block in a general hospital population. Cardiology 2005; 104(4): 193–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Ariyarajah V, Asad N, Tandar A, et al. Interatrial block: pandemic prevalence, significance, and diagnosis. Chest 2005; 128(2): 970–975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES