Abstract
Background and hypothesis: Treatment of patients with refractory chest pain remains a challenge. In this study, the long‐term clinical effects of spinal cord electrical stimulation were evaluated in 10 consecutive male patients (mean age 53.7 years) with chronic chest pain in a prospective observational study.
Methods: After placement of the electrode in an epidural position and before implantation of the device, patients were subjected to clinical evaluation, including atrial pacing, in order to document significant antianginal effects.
Results: Spinal cord electrical stimulation abolished or improved pacing time to angina by more than 50% in seven of the patients who subsequently had the device implanted. In three of these patients, the system was ineffective after a period of 3‐9 months despite paresthesia in the area of anginal pain with electrical stimulation. The effects of treatment remained satisfactory in the remaining patients (40%) after a mean follow‐up of 60 (45‐72) months. Thus, a long‐lasting clinical response was able to be predicted in 57% of the patients.
Conclusion: Spinal cord electrical stimulation is one of the few therapeutic options in inoperable patients with refractory chest pain.
Keywords: spinal cord, electrical stimulation, angina pectoris
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (329.3 KB).
References
- 1. Mannheimer C, Augustinsson L‐E, Carlsson C‐A, Manhem K, Wilhelmsson C: Epidural spinal electrical stimulation in severe angina pectoris. Br Heart J 1988; 59: 56–61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Eliasson T, Albertsson P, Hårdhammer P, Emanuelsson H, Augustinsson LE, Mannheimer C: Spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris with normal coronary arteriograms. Coron Art Dis 1993; 4: 819–827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sanderson JE, Ibrahim B, Waterhouse D, Palmer RBG: Spinal electrical stimulation for intractable angina: Long‐term clinical outcome and safety. Eur Heart J 1994; 15: 810–814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bagger JP, Nielsen TT, Thomassen A: Reproducibility of coronary haemodynamics and cardiac metabolism during pacing‐induced angina pectoris. Clin Physiol 1985; 5: 359–370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Schoebel FC, Frazier OH, Jessurun GAJ, DeJongste MJL, Kadipasaoglu KA, Jax TW, Heintzen MP, Cooley DA, Strauer BE, Leschke M: Refractory angina pectoris in end‐stage coronary artery disease: Evolving therapeutic concepts. Am Heart J 1997; 134: 587–602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Norrsell H, Eliasson T, Mannheimer C, Augustinsson LE, Bergh CH, Andersson B, Waagstein F, Friberg P: Effects of pacing‐induced myocardial stress and spinal cord stimulation on whole body and cardiac norepinephrine spillover. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 1890–1896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hautvast RWM, Blanksma PK, deJongste MJL, Pruim J, Van der Wall EE, Vaalburg W, Lie KI: Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial blood flow assessed by positron emission tomography in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 462–467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Melzack R, Wall PD: Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science 1965; 150: 971–979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Andersen C, Hole P, Oxhoj H: Does pain relief with spinal cord stimulation for angina conceal myocardial infarction? Br Heart J 1994; 71: 419–421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]