Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 31;5(2):129–138. doi: 10.1093/nop/npx026

Table 3.

Univariate Cox regression models exploring predictors for drop out due to death

Drop out due to death1
Hazard Ratio 95% Confidence Interval P value
Age in years 1.09 1.03–1.14 <.01
Sex
male 1.04 0.35–3.12 .94
female 1.00
Eloquent tumor location
yes 1.81 0.59–5.56 .30
no 1.00
Surgery for recurrent tumor
yes 2.59 0.85–7.9 .09
no
Karnofsky Index in percent 0.92 0.88–0.96 <.001
Time since diagnosis in months 0.99 0.97–1.0 .09
Value of Distress Thermometer
≥ 6 1.35 0.44–4.2 .60
<6
Selected EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales
C30 Global Health Status/QoL 0.99 0.96–1.01 .28
C30 Physical functioning 0.98 0.96–1.00 .04
C30 Emotional functioning 1.00 0.98–1.03 .75
C30 Cognitive functioning 0.99 0.97–1.01 .21
BN20 Future uncertainty 1.00 0.98–1.02 1.00
BN20 Motor dysfunction 1.02 1.00–1.04 .02
SCNS-SF34G scores
Physical and daily living needs 0.99 0.95-1.01 .34
Psychological needs 1.00 0.98–1.02 .89
Patient care and support needs 0.99 0.96–1.02 .56
Health system and information needs 0.97 0.93–1.01 .10
Sexuality needs 0.97 0.92–1.02 .19

1 The following factors were not tested for association with death-related drop out due to insufficient number of observation in the respective factor levels: living situation, WHO grade, and chemotherapy