. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 24.

Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2016 Nov 19;209:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.030

Table 2.

Linear multiple regression analyses to examine associations between indices of community functioning and phenotype composite scores

		Step 1	Step 2 ^a				Step 3 ^b

Predictor		R²	R²	Δ R²	R²	Δ R²	Unstandardized coefficient ^c

							SZ-Low	BD-High	SZ-Low vs. BD-Low
MMN	UPSA	.01	.35	.33**	.36	.01
	MASC	.02	.26	.23**	.27	.01
	RFS	.03	.28	.25**	.29	.01
N170+N250	UPSA	.03	.36	.32**	.42	.05
	MASC	.01	.28	.27**	.30	.01
	RFS	.08**	.28	.20**	.30	.13
Percept	UPSA	.01	.35	.34**	.35	.00
	MASC	.01	.26	.24**	.27	.01
	RFS	.03	.28	.25**	.29	.01
Speed of Processing	UPSA	.13**	.37	.24**	.42	.04
	MASC	.06*	.26	.20**	.26	.00
	RFS	.07**	.29	.21**	.33	.05
Working Memory	UPSA	.12**	.37	.16**	.46	.09**	.08**	.01**	−.03**
	MASC	.10**	.26	.16**	.27	.01
	RFS	.12**	.28	.16**	.29	.01
Learning	UPSA	.17**	.38	.21**	.41	.03
	MASC	.10**	.27	.17**	.28	.01
	RFS	.04*	.29	.24**	.29	.00
Low-level Social Cognition	UPSA	.23**	.37	.14**	.38	.01
	MASC	.09**	.26	.17**	.27	.01
	RFS	.14**	.29	.14**	.29	.00
High-level Social Cognition	UPSA	.28**	.40	.12**	.42	.02
	MASC	.09**	.51	.16**	.52	.01
	RFS	.18**	.30	.12**	.31	.01

^a.

Step2 included diagnostic groups that were represented as 2 dummy variables. The SZ-Low group was served as a reference group.

^b.

Step 3 included interaction between diagnostic groups and predictors and we present unstandardized coefficients for the interaction between each diagnostic group and a predictor.

^c.

Unstandardized coefficients are presented with p values from t-tests.