Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 17.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cell. 2019 Jun 17;49(6):852–866.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.05.036

Figure 4. A Cell Size Threshold, Not Spatial Position, Dictates ZGA Onset.

Figure 4.

(A and E) Schematic of confocal imaging of the vegetal pole (VP) (A) and animal pole (AP) (E) in embryos at ~ C13. Z-position along the AV axis in the indicated directions.

(B, C, F and G) Heatmap contour plot of nuclear EU-RNA amount as a function of z-position and distance from embryo center within the vegetal pole (B) and animal pole (F), and of z-position and cell size within the vegetal pole (C) and animal pole (G). Color scales indicate low (blue) to high (red) transcription.

(D and H) EU-RNA amount and percent of transcriptionally active cells as a function of z-position within the indicated sub-regions of the vegetal pole (D) and animal pole (H).

(I) Predicted decision boundaries for ZGA with a perfect sizer (top), positional bias (middle) and mixed sizer and positional effect (bottom). Gray, inactive; red, active; green line, decision boundary for ZGA.

(J) Logistic regression boundary decision for ZGA as a function of cell size and z-position along the AV axis. Each point is a bin of 25 μm by z-position followed by a bin of 250 cells for each of 8 embryos at ~ C12.8-C13.5. Binary activation based on threshold amount EU-RNA. Black square, inactive cells; red square, active cells; green line, decision boundary.

See also Figure S4.