Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0220122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220122

Table 1. Eighteen potentially relevant pathogens scored relative to each other and ranked by expert opinion.

Pathogens Animal classesa Country of originb Rangec
Min Max
Salmonella spp. d Birds, reptiles, amphibians Worldwide 2 4
Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus Birds, mammals, reptiles China, Egypt, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, UAE 2 3
West Nile virus Birds Brazil, Canada, South Africa, Tanzania, USA 2 3
Yersinia pestise Mammals Argentina, Egypt 2 3
Arenavirusese Mammals Argentina 1 3
Eastern equine encephalitis virus Birds, reptiles Brazil, Canada, Columbia, Ecuador, USA 2 2
Japanese encephalitis virus Birds Philippines, Singapore 2 2
Western equine encephalitis virus Birds, reptiles Argentina, Canada, Guyana, Peru, Suriname, USA 2 2
Rocio virus Birds Brazil 1 2
Ross river virus Mammals Indonesia 1 2
Saint Louis encephalitis virus Birds Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Cuba, Peru, Suriname, USA 1 2
Sindbis viruse Birds Tanzania 1 2
Venezuelan equine encephalitis viruse Birds Peru, USA 1 2
Echinococcus granulosuse Mammals Chile 1 2
Rickettsia africae/ African tick bite fevere Mammals South Africa 1 1
Rickettsia typhiie Mammals Mexico 1 1
Rickettsia rickettsiie Mammals Argentina 1 1
T-cell lymphotropic virus 1/HTLV-1 Mammals Ghana, Peru, Tanzania, USA 1 1

a Animal classes that were imported into the Netherlands in 2013–2014 that could play a role in the transmission of the pathogen.

b Countries where pathogen is present and where animals were imported from into the Netherlands in 2013–2014

c A scale of 1 to 4 was used, where 1 represents the lowest risk and 4 the highest risk

d Only scored by two of the experts as the pathogen was outside the field of expertise of one expert and the other expert indicated that there was not enough information to decide on the risk

e Only scored by three of the experts as the pathogen was outside the field of expertise of one expert