Table 3.
Path | Parameter Estimate | ||
---|---|---|---|
b | SE | p | |
Direct Effects | |||
SES→Set-Shifting | .084 | .039 | .029 |
SES→Inhibitory Control | 0* | — | — |
SES→School Readiness | .252 | .089 | .005 |
Set-Shifting→School Readiness | .402 | .083 | <.001 |
Inhibitory Control→School Readiness | .581 | .123 | <.001 |
Chaos→Set-Shifting | 0* | — | — |
Chaos→Inhibitory Control | 0* | — | — |
Chaos→School Readiness | −.440 | .210 | .036 |
Set-Shifting ↔Inhibitory Control | 8.647 | 1.692 | <.001 |
Indirect Effects | |||
SES→Set-Shifting→School Readiness | .034 | .017 | .048 |
Total Effects | |||
SES→Set-Shifting→School Readiness | .286 | .089 | .001 |
Note:
Note: indicates that the parameter was fixed to 0. SES= socioeconomic status; b=unstandardized regression coefficient; SE= standard error. Model fit statistics χ2 (5, N=564) = 6.751, p=0.240; RMSEA= 0.025 (90% CI=0.000, 0.067); CFI=.983; SRMR=0.028. Sex was included as a covariate to account for potential sex differences in executive function, bsex, set-shifting = −1.844, SEb-sex, set-shifting = .642, bsex, inhibitory control = 0*, SEb-inhibitory control = N/A.