Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Mar;44(2):293–307. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0723-8

Table 4.

Results of the Mixed-Effects Models for Cognitive Restructuring Fidelity, Global CBT Competence, and CBT Expertise

Parameters β SE 95% CI t p value
Cognitive Restructuring Fidelity
  Condition −0.08 0.23 (−0.53, 0.37) 0.34 p = .74
  Time −0.08 0.06 (−0.20, 0.4) 1.28 p = .20
  Training 0.66 0.22 (0.23, 1.08) 3.02 p = .003
  Condition X Time 0.50 0.09 (0.34, 0.67) 5.88 p < .001
  Condition X Training −0.58 0.30 (−1.17, 0.01) 1.93 p = .06
  Constant 1.32 0.17 (0.99, 1.64) 7.82 p <.001
Global CBT Competence
  Condition −0.02 0.52 (−1.02, 0.99) 0.03 p = .97
  Time −0.13 0.13 (−0.38, 0.12) 0.99 p = .32
  Training 1.63 0.45 (0.75, 2.51) 3.61 p < .001
  Condition X Time 1.04 0.18 (0.70, 1.39) 5.87 p < .001
  Condition X Training −1.24 0.63 (−2.46, −0.03) 1.99 p = .05
  Constant 2.68 0.38 (1.95, 3.41) 7.13 p <.001
CBT Expertise
  Condition −0.02 0.16 (−0.32, 0.29) 0.10 p = .93
  Time −0.06 0.05 (−0.15, 0.03) 1.39 p = .17
  Training 0.47 0.16 (0.16, 0.79) 2.34 p = .004
  Condition X Time 0.32 0.06 (0.19, 0.44) 4.99 p < .001
  Condition X Training −0.45 0.22 (−0.88, −0.02) 2.02 p = .04
  Constant 1.16 0.12 (0.93, 1.38) 10.05 p <.001