Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2014 Sep 16;103:391–400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.010

Table 1.

Comparison of MIR, RV5% (number of ICs with dipolarity greater than 95%), and QIc yielded by FastICA and Infomax respectively on each of the 14 datasets considered in the present work. The highest values for each dataset are shaded and the median values over all the datasets are displayed in the last column.

MIR (kbit/s) DS 1 DS 2 DS 3 DS 4 DS 5 DS 6 DS 7 DS 8 DS 9 DS 10 DS 11 DS 12 DS 13 DS 14 MEDIAN
FastICA 44.41 34.35 35.71 38.04 36.85 54.13 29.53 41.53 31.64 28.51 38.69 36.47 43.91 53.91 37.45
Infomax 46.16 35.50 41.89 40.48 40.27 56.04 33.28 45.15 35.89 26.97 40.19 44.28 44.90 55.85 41.18

RV5%

FastICA 28 24 15 18 25 15 19 9 9 2 29 25 21 14 18.5
Infomax 33 28 14 18 28 18 20 1 14 0 25 28 25 20 20.0

median QIc%

FastICA 88.5 79.4 59.7 82.8 90.0 68.4 70.1 39.5 76.7 28.1 92.2 92.2 88.7 83.2 81.1
Infomax 92.5 92.5 84.3 89.7 93.1 84.0 87.8 66.0 85.5 26.0 93.3 94.8 90.7 91.3 90.2