Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 24;5(2):113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2019.05.004

Table 3.

Association between handgrip strength and risk of hypertension.

Population Handgrip strength Unadjusted

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Entire Low (n = 2611) Ref Ref Ref Ref
Moderate (n = 2575) 0.96 (0.861.08) 0.512 0.98 (0.871.11) 0.770 0.96 (0.851.08) 0.515 0.97 (0.861.10) 0.693
High (n = 2566) 1.11 (1.001.24) 0.056 1.19 (1.061.34) 0.004 1.02 (0.901.15) 0.768 1.03 (0.911.17) 0.653
Male Low (n = 997) Ref Ref Ref Ref
Moderate (n = 986) 0.89 (0.741.07) 0.221 0.92 (0.761.12) 0.398 0.92 (0.761.12) 0.408 0.93 (0.761.14) 0.504
High (n = 977) 1.04 (0.861.25) 0.718 1.10 (0.911.34) 0.331 0.88 (0.721.08) 0.213 0.89 (0.731.10) 0.307
Female Low (n = 1597) Ref Ref Ref Ref
Moderate (n = 1569) 1.01 (0.881.16) 0.937 1.02 (0.871.18) 0.817 0.99 (0.841.15) 0.877 1.00 (0.861.18) 0.946
High (n = 1564) 1.16 (1.011.34) 0.033 1.25 (1.081.46) 0.004 1.12 (0.961.31) 0.147 1.13 (0.961.33) 0.129

OR: odd ratio; CI: confidence interval; Ref: reference.

Model 1: Adjusted for age and gender. Model 2: Adjusted for smoking, drinking, body mass index, physical activity and the covariates in model 1. Model 3: Adjusted for fasting glucose level, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglyceride and the covariates in model 2.