Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 20;5(7):e02086. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02086

Table 5.

Contingency table and degree of agreement, with 95% confidence interval, between the different diagnostic tests using indices of positive and negative agreement (Ppos, Pneg). CATT = CATT/T. evansi, ELISA = ELISA/VGS RoTat 1.2, TL = immune trypanolysis, PCR = RoTat 1.2 PCR.

CATT
ELISA
TL
PCR
Pos Neg Pos Neg Pos Neg Pos Neg
GST Pos 20 5 19 2 18 3 16 9
Neg 314 707 213 772 193 792 44 457
Total 334 712 232 774 211 795 60 466
Ppos 0.11 (0.07–0.16) 0.15 (0.09–0.21) 0.16 (0.10–0.22) 0.38 (0.23–0.51)
Pneg 0.82 (0.80–0.84) 0.88 (0.87–0.90) 0.89 (0.87–0.90) 0.95 (0.93–0.96)
CATT Pos 183 132 173 142 41 275
Neg 49 642 38 653 19 201
Total 232 774 211 795 60 476
Ppos 0.67 (0.62–0.71) 0.66 (0.61–0.70) 0.22 (0.16–0.28)
Pneg 0.88 (0.86–0.89) 0.88 (0.86–0.89) 0.58 (0.54 0.62)
ELISA Pos 191 41 42 170
Neg 20 753 15 263
Total 211 794 57 433
Ppos 0.86 (0.82–0.89) 0.31 (0.24–0.38)
Pneg 0.96 (0.95–0.97) 0.74 (0.70–0.77)
TL Pos 42 159
Neg 15 275
Total 57 434
Ppos 0.33 (0.25–0.40)
Pneg 0.76 (0.72–0.79)