Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hypertension. 2019 Jun 24;74(2):260–266. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12844

Table 5.

AORs for the Prevalence of EBP/HTN and HTN Per 2-Year Survey Cycle, Among US Youths, 2003–2016 (N=12 249)

Model EBP/HTN HTN
AOR
(95% CI)
β-Coefficient P Value AOR
(95% CI)
β-Coefficient P Value
1* 0.92 (0.87–0.96) −0.086 <0.001 0.89 (0.83–0.95) −0.118 0.001
2 0.91 (0.86–0.96) −0.095 <0.001 0.88 (0.82–0.95) −0.126 0.001
3 0.91 (0.87–0.96) −0.089 0.001 0.89 (0.82–0.96) −0.119 0.002
4§ 0.91 (0.86–0.96) −0.096 <0.001 0.88 (0.82–0.95) −0.123 0.001
5 0.90 (0.85–0.95) −0.103 <0.001 0.88 (0.81–0.95) −0.130 0.001
6 0.91 (0.87–0.96) −0.093 <0.001 0.88 (0.82–0.95) −0.123 0.001
7# 0.91 (0.87–0.96) −0.089 0.001 0.89 (0.82–0.96) −0.118 0.002

AOR indicates adjusted odds ratio; EBP, elevated blood pressure or hypertension; and HTN, hypertension.

*

Model 1 is adjusted for survey cycle, age (y), sex, and race and Hispanic origin.

Model 2 is model 1 plus weight status

Model 3 is model 2 plus usual daily sodium intake (mg).

§

Model 4 is model 3 plus usual daily energy intake (kcal).

Model 5 is model 2 plus usual sodium density (mg/1000 kcal) and usual daily energy intake (kcal).

Model 6 is model 2 plus usual sodium-to-potassium ratio (mmol/mmol).

#

Model 7 is model 6 plus usual daily potassium intake (mmol).