Table 2. Photovoltaic performance of the perovskite devices employed with best performing dopant-free small molecule-based HTMs sorted by PCE of the champion device.

ID	J sc (mA cm–2)	V oc (V)	FF	PCE (%)	Ref. PCE a (%)	Lit. ref.
TPA-ANT-TPA	21.07	1.03	0.796	17.5	16.8	150
TPAC3M b	22.79	1.00	0.78	17.54	12.6	155
CuPc-OBu	22.8	1.06	0.73	17.6	18.8	161
CuPrPc c	23.2	1.01	0.76	17.8	17.5	160
V1036 b	21.9	1.09	0.81	17.8	19.2	163
mDPA-DBTP c	21.13	1.12	0.76	18.09	17.82	151
m-MTDATA b	22.50	1.035	0.78	18.12	13.44	152
PCA-1 c	22.30	1.062	0.767	18.17	18.30	154
NiPc-(OBu)8	23.1	1.08	0.734	18.3	19.4	162
Trux-OMeTAD b	23.2	1.02	0.79	18.6	16.3	149
ICTH2	24.78	1.03	0.735	18.75	14.74	159
TAPC b	22.32	1.04	0.811	18.8	12.9	153
FA-CN	21.71	1.13	0.77	18.9	19.2	158
KR321	21.70	1.13	0.78	19.03	19.01	157
YN2	23.15	1.11	0.75	19.27	17.80	156

^aDoped spiro-OMeTAD or PEDOT:PSS was used as the reference in most of the cases.

^bp–i–n device architecture.

^cPlanar device architecture.