Table 3. Photovoltaic performance of the perovskite devices employed with best performing dopant-free polymeric HTMs sorted by PCE of the champion device.
| ID | J sc (mA cm–2) | V oc (V) | FF | PCE (%) | Ref. PCE a (%) | Lit. ref. |
| P3CT-Na b | 21.3 | 1.05 | 0.75 | 18.3 | — | 165 |
| Asy-PBTBDT | 22.4 | 1.11 | 0.732 | 18.3 | 18.5 | 169 |
| PTB7 c | 22.6 | 1.13 | 0.71 | 18.5 | 13 | 168 |
| pDPP5T-2 c | 21.5 | 1.15 | 0.76 | 18.9 | 13 | 168 |
| PCDTBT1 c | 22.2 | 1.1 | 0.782 | 19.1 | 19.4 | 171 |
| P3CT-CH3NH2 b | 22.2 | 1.09 | 0.81 | 19.6 | — | 165 |
| DTB | 25.5 | 1.10 | 0.698 | 19.68 | 19.81 | 167 |
| TB(MA) b | 23.45 | 1.08 | 0.78 | 19.76 | 16.93 | 166 |
| PDBT-T1 c | 22.2 | 1.17 | 0.77 | 19.8 | 13 | 168 |
| PTEG c | 22.5 | 1.14 | 0.77 | 19.8 | 17.9 | 170 |
| PDCBT c | 22.7 | 1.17 | 0.80 | 21.2 | 13 | 168 |
aDoped spiro-OMeTAD or PTAA was used as the reference in most of the cases.
bp–i–n device architecture.
cPlanar device architecture.