Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Aug 10;27(11):1335–1341. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6947

Table 4.

Risk of Physician-Reported Adherence to Recommendations Against Ovarian Cancer Screening by Patient and Physician Characteristics, Unadjusted and Adjusted Modelsa

Unadjusted risk ratios (95% CI) Adjusted risk ratios (95% CI)
 Nonprofessional cancer experience
   None  (Ref.)  (Ref.)
   Any  0.80 (0.71–0.90)  0.82 (0.73–0.92)
 Patient characteristics
  Patient age
   35  (Ref.)  (Ref.)
   51  0.99 (0.88–1.11)  1.00 (0.90–1.11)
  Screening requested
   No  (Ref.)  (Ref.)
   Yes  0.80 (0.71–0.90)  0.82 (0.74–0.92)
  Patient race
   White  (Ref.)  (Ref.)
   Black  1.02 (0.91–1.15)  1.03 (0.93–1.15)
  Patient insurance
   Medicaid  (Ref.)  (Ref.)
   Private  0.89 (0.79–1.00)  0.86 (0.78–0.96)
 Physician characteristics
  Reported belief in TVU or CA125 as effective for ovarian cancer screening
   No  (Ref.)  (Ref.)
   Yes  0.58 (0.48–0.70)  0.61 (0.51–0.73)
  Listed USPSTF among top three sources of cancer screening information
   No  (Ref.)  (Ref.)
   Yes  1.27 (1.12–1.44)  1.15 (1.03–1.28)

Results were adjusted using weights to represent the specialty distribution of the practicing U.S. physician population of family physicians, general internists, and obstetrician-gynecologists.

a

Adjusted model includes all variables in the table.

USPSTF, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.