Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem. 2018 Apr 11;26(19):5270–5273. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.04.002

Table 4.

Reaction optimization.

graphic file with name nihms-1034553-t0006.jpg
entry equiv PhIO conc. mol % cat.a 4a : 4b total yieldb
1 3.5 0.05 M 10% 2.7 : 1 73%
2 2 0.05 M 10% 2.8 : 1 83%
3 1 0.05 M 10% 2.8 : 1 62% (20%)
4 2 0.1 M 10% 2.9 : 1 80%
5 2 Phl(OAc)2 0.1 M 10% 2.9 : 1 54%
6 2 Phl(OPiv)2 0.1 M 10% 2.7 : 1 51%
7 2 0.2 M 10% 3.4 : 1 82%
8 2 0.4 M 10% 3.2 : 1 80%
9 2 0.2 M 5% 2.6 : 1 65% (8%)
10c 2 0.2 M 5% 3.0 : 1 80%
11c 2 0.2 M 2% 3.0 : 1 79%
12d 2 0.1 M 10% 2.9 : 1 52%
13e 2 0.1 M 10% 2.7 : 1 77%
14f 2 0.1 M 10% 3.2 : 1 75%
a

Standard condition: 10 mol % AgOTf, 12.5 mol % tpa, 3.5 equiv PhIO, 0.05 M H2O, 40 °C, 30 min.

b

NMR yields based on mesitylene as internal standard, recovered 4 in parentheses.

c

The reaction was run overnight.

d

pH 2.8 Na2HPO4:citric acid hydrate buffer.

e

pH 5.0 NaOAc buffer.

f

pH 9.5 Na2CO3:NaHCO3 buffer.