Table 5. Results of the proposed method compared to results of other composting methods.
Composted material | Size (Liter) | Rotation protocol | Aeration protocol | Lag phase duration (hr) |
Active phase duration+ (day) |
Tc, max (°C) |
Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cattle manure & green vegetables & sawdust | 250 | 3 rotations/ | |||||
6hr | Intermittent | Not reported | 9 | 53 | [16] | ||
12hr | 11 | 53 | |||||
18hr | 9 | 55 | |||||
24hr | 8 | 58 | |||||
Different mixtures of vegetables wastes & cow manure & sawdust | 550 | 1 rotation/24 hr | Intermittent | Not reported | 8–12 | 61–66 | [17] |
Pig & poultry carcasses | 360 | 24-min rotations/ | |||||
1hr | Intermittent | Not reported | 11 | 60 | [21] | ||
2hr | 16 | 62 | |||||
3hr | 17 | 70 | |||||
4hr | 18 | 70 | |||||
Penicillin mycelial dreg & sewage sludge & sawdust & rice straw | 390 | static | Continuous | Not reported | 28 | 65 | [14] |
Tomato residues & chicken manure | 200 | Continuous | Continuous | 10 | 4.5 | 66.8 | Present study |
+ The active periods were determined, based on the definition in this study, from the Tc evolution figures reported in the corresponding references.