Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0220343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220343

Table 5. Results of the proposed method compared to results of other composting methods.

Composted material Size (Liter) Rotation protocol Aeration protocol Lag phase
duration (hr)
Active phase duration+
(day)
Tc, max
(°C)
Ref.
Cattle manure & green vegetables & sawdust 250 3 rotations/
6hr Intermittent Not reported 9 53 [16]
12hr 11 53
18hr 9 55
24hr 8 58
Different mixtures of vegetables wastes & cow manure & sawdust 550 1 rotation/24 hr Intermittent Not reported 8–12 61–66 [17]
Pig & poultry carcasses 360 24-min rotations/
1hr Intermittent Not reported 11 60 [21]
2hr 16 62
3hr 17 70
4hr 18 70
Penicillin mycelial dreg & sewage sludge & sawdust & rice straw 390 static Continuous Not reported 28 65 [14]
Tomato residues & chicken manure 200 Continuous Continuous 10 4.5 66.8 Present study

+ The active periods were determined, based on the definition in this study, from the Tc evolution figures reported in the corresponding references.