Table 6.

Binomial Logistic Regression Analyses Examining Relations Between Client Factors and Compliance Entered Separately

	Less Intensive Services vs Compliance^a
Client variables (at intake)	B	Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Functioning	−.015^**	.985 (.98, .99)
Problem Severity	.016^*	1.02 (1.00, 1.03)
Juvenile Justice Involvement	.005	1.00 (.67, 1.49)
Risk of Harm to Self	−.153	.858 (.70, 1.05)
Risk of Harm to Others	475^***	1.61 (1.28, 2.01)
Family Problems	.080	1.08 (.87, 1.34)
Substance Use	−.250^*	.779 (.63, .96)
School Problems	.392^*	1.48 (1.41, 1.56)
Age	−.001	.999 (.99, 1.01)
Ethnic Minority Status	.243	1.27 (.99, 1.64)
Insurance Status	.143	1.15 (.89, 1.5)
Diagnosis
ADHD	.208	1.23 (.82, 1.85)
Anxiety	−.383	.68 (.40, 1.16)
Conduct	.319^*	1.37 (1.05, 1.81)
Depression	.318^*	1.37 (1.02, 1.86)
Serious Mental Illness	−.026	.974 (.66, 1.44)
Other	−.109	.90 (78, 1.04)
Multiple diagnoses	.114	1.12 (.90, 1.39)

The reference category is: Compliance

p<.05

^**

p<.01

^***

p<.001