Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Liver Dis. 2015 Mar 12;19(2):361–379. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2015.01.012

Table 1.

Risk of obesity, diabetes, and NAFLD on incidence of HCC

Author, Year Location Cases Study Type Risk
Measurement
Reported
Risk
Obesity
Moller et al,9 1994 Denmark 43,965 Case control RR 1.9
Wolk et al,10 2001 Sweden 28,129 Case control SIR 2.4
Calle et al,8 2003 USA 90,000 Prospective RR 1.68 (F), 4.52 (M)
Oh et al,11 2005 Korea 781,283 Prospective RR 1.56
Larsson et al,12 2007 NA 11,079 Meta-analysis RR 1.89
Diabetes
Adami et al,15 1996 Sweden 153,852 Case control SIR 4.1
Wideroff et al,17 1997 Denmark 109,581 Case control SIR 4 (M), 2.1 (F)
El-Serag et al,16 2004 USA 824,263 Case control HRR 2.16
Yang et al,18 2011 NA NR Meta-analysis RR 1.87
Wang et al,111 2012 NA NR Meta-analysis RR 2.31
NAFLD/NASH
Adams et al,26 2005 USA 420 Prospective Prevalence 0.5%
Ekstedt et al,24 2006 Sweden 129 Prospective Prevalence 2.3%
Rafiq et al,25 2009 USA 173 Retrospective Prevalence 0% NAFLD and 2.8% NASH
Ascha et al,28 2010 USA 195 Retrospective Prevalence 12.8% in NASH cirrhosis

Abbreviations: CC, cryptogenic cirrhosis; F, female; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HRR, hazard rate ratios; M, male; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; SIR, standardized incidence ratio.

Data from Refs.812,1519,2426,28