Skip to main content
. 2019 May 28;7(5):e13153. doi: 10.2196/13153

Table 2.

Comparison of home blood pressure recording fidelity in all participants

Outcome measures and parameter Smartphone app (n=38) Logbook (n=41) Difference (95% CI) P value
Fidelitya




Median (IQRb) 66.7 (32.1 to 83.3) 52.4 (29.8 to 72.6) 8.33c (−4.76 to 22.6) .21d

Mean (SD) 58.6 (29.2) 50.7 (27.2) 7.95 (−4.67 to 20.6) .21e

LS meanf (RMSEg) 59.2 (28.3) 49.8 (28.3) 9.43 (−3.15 to 22.0) .14h
Time-independent fidelity




Median (IQR) 88.7 (57.1 to 97.6) 84.5 (56.0 to 96.4) 2.38c (−3.57 to 11.9) .30d

Mean (SD) 78.4 (22.4) 73.2 (27.4) 5.21 (−6.07 to 16.5) .36e

LS mean (RMSE) 78.8 (26.2) 72.8 (26.2) 6.01 (−5.36 to 17.4) .30h

aFidelity is defined as the percentage of specified home blood pressure readings over the 3-week home blood pressure monitoring regimen which was recorded, regimen compliant, and successfully reported at the final clinic visit.

bIQR: interquartile range.

cHodges-Lehmann shift parameter estimate (median difference).

dWilcoxon rank-sum test.

e2-sample t test.

fLS mean: least-squares mean.

gRMSE: root mean square error.

hMixed-model longitudinal analysis of variance (ANOVA) adjusting for age, study arm, age by study arm interaction, and baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressures.