Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 25;9:10778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47324-z

Table 1.

Socio-demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Sample (N = 101)

Variables Mean (SD) or N (%) Range
Age 57.65 (14.18) 22–84
Sex
 Male 79 (78.2)
Ethnicity
 Caucasian 74 (73.3)
 Black/African American 22 (21.8)
 Asian/pacific islander 2 (2.0)
 Another race/multiracial 3 (3.0)
Marital Status
 Married or living with a partner 75 (74.2)
 Separated or divorced 14 (13.9)
 Widowed 2 (2.0)
 Single/never married 10 (9.9)
Education
 Less than high school 7 (6.9)
 High school graduate 31 (30.7)
 Some college 37 (36.6)
 College graduate 19 (18.9)
 Any post-graduate 7 (7.0)
Occupational status
 Employed 8 (8.0)
 Unemployed 7 (6.9)
 Retired 45 (44.6)
 On disability 40 (39.6)
 Student 1 (1.0)
Perceived income adequacy
 Totally inadequate 10 (9.9)
 Not very well 29 (28.7)
 Adequate 52 (51.5)
 Very well 10 (9.9)
HF etiology
 Ischemic 45 (55.4)
NYHA functional class
 I 15 (14.9)
 II 62 (61.4)
 III 23 (22.8)
 IV 1 (1.0)
 Years since HF diagnosis 9.78 (8.12) .30–35
LVAD Strategy
 Destination therapy 66 (65.3)
 Bridge to transplantation 35 (34.7)
Type of LVAD
 HVAD 17 (16.8)
 HeartMate II 73 (72.3)
 HeartMate III 11 (10.9)
 Months since LVAD Implant 19.48 (15.37) 2–69

HF, heart failure; LVAD, Left Ventricular Assist Device; NYHA, New York Heart Association.