Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: Heart. 2019 Feb 12;105(14):1063–1069. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314269

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of mechanical dispersion between controls, all mitral valve prolapse patients (MVP total), arrhythmic MVP patients (A-MVP) and non-arrhythmic MVP patients (NA-MVP). A-MVP patients had significantly higher mechanical dispersion compared with controls (mean 59 vs 42 ms, p<0.001) and NA-MVP patients (mean 59 vs 43 ms, p<0.001). There was no difference in mechanical dispersion between the control and the NA-MVP groups (p=0.78).