Table 2.
Results of the group analysis (n = 33)
| MNI coordinates (mm) | Cluster level | Peak | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain region | x | y | z | pFWEc | k | Z |
| Face-matching > shape-matching | ||||||
| R middle temporal gyrus | 55 | –42 | 6 | p < 0.0001 | 8605 | 7.54 |
| R AMY | 19 | –8 | –16 | 6.87 | ||
| R inferior occipital gyrus | 25 | –94 | –4 | p < 0.0001 | 2339 | 7.37 |
| R fusiform gyrus | 41 | –44 | –22 | 6.54 | ||
| L lingual gyrus | –21 | –96 | –14 | p < 0.0001 | 2143 | 7.30 |
| L fusiform gyrus | –41 | –50 | –22 | 6.61 | ||
| R inferior frontal gyrus | 47 | 30 | 8 | p < 0.0001 | 5966 | 7.24 |
| L middle temporal gyrus | –53 | –60 | 10 | p < 0.0001 | 5096 | 6.91 |
| L inferior frontal gyrus | –45 | 34 | 2 | p < 0.0001 | 9479 | 6.63 |
| L AMY | –19 | –8 | –14 | p < 0.0001 | 1110 | 6.52 |
| R precuneus | 9 | –58 | 40 | p < 0.0001 | 861 | 6.50 |
| R inferior temporal gyrus | 43 | –12 | –42 | p < 0.0001 | 569 | 6.18 |
| L inferior temporal gyrus | –43 | –16 | –44 | p < 0.0001 | 478 | 6.12 |
| L cerebellum | –17 | –74 | –34 | p < 0.0001 | 604 | 5.78 |
| R middle frontal gyrus | 27 | 50 | 6 | p = 0.0018 | 229 | 4.20 |
| Effect of valence (ANOVA) | ||||||
| R medial temporal pole | 45 | 10 | –36 | p = 0.043 | 103 | 5.06 |
| L anterior cingulate cortex | –3 | 50 | –2 | p < 0.0001 | 615 | 4.98 |
| R superior temporal gyrus | 49 | –6 | –4 | p = 0.002 | 185 | 4.77 |
| L medial temporal pole | –43 | 14 | –34 | p < 0.0001 | 350 | 4.65 |
| L lingual gyrus | –17 | –66 | –4 | p = 0.041 | 104 | 4.56 |
| L AMY | –19 | –6 | –24 | p = 0.009 | 142 | 4.55 |
| R parahippocampal gyrus | 23 | –16 | –20 | p = 0.001 | 196 | 4.55 |
| R AMY | 21 | –2 | –26 | 4.15 | ||
| Post hoc t tests of valence conditions | ||||||
| Negative faces > neutral faces | ||||||
| R medial temporal pole | 45 | 10 | –36 | p < 0.0001 | 511 | 5.53 |
| L anterior cingulate cortex | –3 | 50 | –2 | p < 0.0001 | 1254 | 5.40 |
| R superior temporal gyrus | 49 | –6 | –4 | p < 0.0001 | 393 | 5.26 |
| L temporal pole | –35 | 20 | –22 | p < 0.0001 | 1124 | 5.07 |
| L AMY | –19 | –6 | –24 | 5.05 | ||
| R parahippocampal gyrus | 27 | –20 | –22 | p = 0.0003 | 325 | 4.99 |
| R AMY | 21 | 0 | –28 | 4.47 | ||
| L fusiform gyrus | –21 | –52 | –16 | p < 0.0001 | 791 | 4.67 |
| R paracentral lobule | 9 | –32 | 58 | p = 0.015 | 173 | 4.55 |
| R paracentral lobule | 11 | –44 | 66 | p = 0.04 | 138 | 4.26 |
| L inferior frontal gyrus | –39 | 32 | 2 | p = 0.037 | 141 | 4.24 |
| L middle frontal gyrus | –27 | 16 | 52 | p = 0.037 | 141 | 4.14 |
| L superior temporal gyrus | –55 | –10 | –4 | p = 0.028 | 150 | 3.95 |
| L superior medial gyrus | –9 | 38 | 50 | p = 0.036 | 142 | 3.78 |
| Positive faces > neutral faces | ||||||
| L lingual gyrus | –19 | –66 | –6 | p = 0.043 | 136 | 4.59 |
| Negative faces > positive faces | ||||||
| L inferior temporal gyrus | –45 | 2 | –34 | p = 0.048 | 132 | 4.42 |
Significant clusters on whole-brain level in the second-level contrast face matching versus shape matching, the ANOVA across valence conditions, and post hoc t tests. Significance level at whole-brain cluster-level threshold pFWEc < 0.05, cluster-defining threshold at pCDT < 0.001. k, cluster size; R, right; L, left.