Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: Value Health. 2018 Apr 9;21(6):724–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.02.002

Table 3 –

Undiscounted within - trial total costs and total QALYs as well as differences for conventional vs. intensive blood glucose control estimated from the UKPDS 72 [14] and other modeling groups.

Simulation
outcomes
UKPDS
72
Participating modeling groups
Cardiff
model
ECHO-
T2DM
MDM-
TTM
MICADO IQVIA-
CDM
UKPDS-OM
version 1
UKPDS-OM
version 2

Total costs*
 Conventional 26,516 26,996 14,806 13,094 13,288 34,523 21,154 19,428
 Intensive 27,865 28,936 16,733 13,529 14,366 32,986 23,121 21,689
Differences in total cost 1,349 1,940 1,927 435 1,078 −1,537 1,967 2,261
Within-trial QALYs
 Conventional 7.62 7.64 7.96 6.94 NR 7.27 NR NR
 Intensive 7.72 7.67 7.99 6.96 NR 7.32 NR NR
Differences in within-trial QALYs 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.02 NR 0.05 NR NR
Total QALYs
 Conventional 16.35 17.23 15.94 16.75 9.22 18.13 16.59 19.14
 Intensive 16.62 17.47 16.11 16.94 9.50 18.45 16.79 19.29
Differences in total QALYs 0.27 0.24 1.17 0.19 0.28 0.32 0.20 0.15

ECHO, Economics and Health Outcomes Model of T2DM; MDM-TTM, Medical Decision Modeling Inc.—Treatment Transitions Model; MICADO, Modelling Integrated Care for Diabetes based on Observational data; NR, not reported; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; IQVIA-CDM, IQVIA-CORE Diabetes Model; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; UKPDS, UK Prospective Diabetes Study; UKPDS-OM, UKPDS Outcomes Model.

*

Costs are presented in 2004 British pounds.