Table 2.
Parameters of network | Cerebellar infarction (n = 32) | Control group (n = 29) | T-value | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eglob | 6.61 ± 2.34 | 7.91 ± 2.18 | −2.23 | 0.030* |
Eloc | 10.43 ± 3.37 | 12.27 ± 2.92 | −2.12 | 0.038* |
Cp | 2.29 ± 1.16& | 1.51 ± 0.61& | 3.24 | 0.002* |
γ | 5.00 ± 0.82 | 4.70 ± 0.70 | 1.52 | 0.135 |
λ | 1.15 ± 0.06 | 1.12 ± 0.06 | 1.63 | 0.108 |
Lp | 1.72 ± 0.69# | 1.37 ± 0.42# | 2.37 | 0.021* |
σ | 4.36 ± 0.67 | 4.19 ± 0.62 | 1.03 | 0.309 |
There were significant differences in the network parameters Eglob, Eloc, Cp and Lp between the cerebellar infarction group and the control group. Eglob, global efficiency; Eloc, local efficiency; Cp, clustering coefficient; γ, normalized clustering coefficient; λ, normalized characteristic path length; Lp, shortest path length, σ, small-worldness. Values are represented as the mean ± SD.
indicate *10−2
indicate *10−1.
P <0.05 was considered significant.