Table 4.
Brain regions with significant differences in nodal efficiency among the two groups.
| Region | T-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| DCG.R | −4.054 | 0.000 |
| IFGoperc.R | −3.632 | 0.001 |
| ORBinf.L | −3.632 | 0.001 |
| SMA.L | −3.559 | 0.001 |
| SMA.R | −3.456 | 0.001 |
| PCUN.R | −3.389 | 0.001 |
| TPOsup.L | −3.258 | 0.002 |
| DCG.L | −3.116 | 0.003 |
| TPOmid.L | −3.101 | 0.003 |
| PCG.R | −2.995 | 0.004 |
| PCUN.L | −2.965 | 0.004 |
| PCG.L | −2.926 | 0.005 |
Nodal efficiency was compared between the two groups using an independent-samples t-test. P <0.05 (false discovery rate corrected) was considered to be significantly different between the two groups. For T values, each negative column represents cerebellar infarction group < the control group. DCG, median cingulate and paracingulate gyri; IFGoperc, inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part; ORBinf, inferior frontal gyrus, orbital part; SMA, supplementary motor area; PCUN, precuneus; TPOsup, temporal pole, superior temporal gyrus; TPOmid, temporal pole, middle temporal gyrus; PCG, posterior cingulate gyrus.