Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 26;9:10864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47391-2

Figure 1.

Figure 1

General experimental design and IFP-MSC/BM-MSC growth kinetics, clonogenicity, immunophenotype and chondrogenic capacity. (A) General scheme depicting cell sources, stimulation and outcomes (created with BioRender). (B) Growth rate time course for representative individual CFU-Fs within IFP- and BM-MSC cultures showing colony confluency. (C) Entire culture growth kinetics of naïve IFP- and BM-MSC cultures until confluency (left panel), show comparable growth. Effect of TNFα/IFNγ (TI) or TNFα/IFNγ/CTGF (TIC) priming on IFP- and BM-MSC culture growth kinetics (middle and right panels). Both TI- and TIC- priming resulted in diminished proliferation for IFP-MSC. (D) Clonogenic capacity of naïve IFP- and BM-MSC cultures (CFU-Fs per 103 MSC seeded). IFP-MSC generated significantly higher number of CFU-F compared to BM-MSC. (E) Chondrogenic differentiation capacity of naïve IFP- and BM-MSC. Chondro-pellet morphology (left photomicrographs), Hematoxylin and Eosin staining (H&E, middle photomicrographs), Toluidine blue staining (right photomicrographs). (F) sGAG production on day 21 of differentiation. IFP-MSC showed significantly higher sGAG production compared to BM-MSC. sGAGs production was normalized to total DNA content, comparable between IFP- and BM-MSC. All experiments (n = 3) were performed independently (3 different donors) and data are presented as scatter plots with mean ± SD. Unpaired t-test was used for statistical analysis *p < 0.05.