Table 2. Multivariate analysis of the factors associated with caesarean delivery (n = 1350).
Restricted model | Complete model | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||
Place of residence (reference = rural) | ||||||
Urban | 2.25** | 1.74 | 2.90 | 1.98** | 1.48 | 2.67 |
Place of delivery (reference = public sector) | ||||||
Private sector | 1.34 | 0.81 | 2.20 | 1.27 | 0.75 | 2.15 |
Antenatal care visits (reference = 4 to 7) | ||||||
3 and less | 0.78 | 0.54 | 1.12 | 0.83 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
8 or more | 1.49** | 1.11 | 2.00 | 1.49** | 1.08 | 2.05 |
Weight of newborn (reference = 2.5 to 3.5 kg) | ||||||
Less than 2.5 kg | 1.96** | 1.09 | 3.53 | 2.16** | 1.18 | 3.95 |
Over 3.5 kg | 1.61** | 1.11 | 2.34 | 1.56** | 1.07 | 2.28 |
Maternal age at delivery (reference = 20–34) | ||||||
15–19 | 0.58 | 0.32 | 1.03 | 0.67 | 0.37 | 1.21 |
35–49 | 2.09** | 1.40 | 3.14 | 2.18** | 1.44 | 3.31 |
Parity (reference = multiparous) | ||||||
Primiparous | 1.42** | 1.07 | 1.89 | 1.39** | 1.04 | 1.86 |
Women’s education (reference = secondary) | ||||||
Primary or less | 1.06 | 0.68 | 1.65 | |||
Tertiary | 1.28 | 0.91 | 1.80 | |||
Household wealth quintile (reference = Poorest) | ||||||
Poor | 1.14 | 0.66 | 1.96 | |||
Middle | 1.16 | 0.74 | 1.83 | |||
Rich | 0.90 | 0.57 | 1.40 | |||
Richest | 1.43 | 0.90 | 2.27 | |||
Ethnicity (reference = Kinh and Hoa) | ||||||
Ethnic minorities | 0.62** | 0.41 | 0.96 | |||
Region (reference = North Central) | ||||||
Mekong River Delta | 0.79 | 0.52 | 1.22 | |||
Red River Delta | 0.59** | 0.38 | 0.91 | |||
Northern Midlands | 1.06 | 0.71 | 1.57 | |||
Central Highlands | 0.52 | 0.33 | 1.09 | |||
Southeast | 0.78 | 0.51 | 1.20 |
Abbreviations and signs: CS, cesarean section; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval;
**, p ≤ 0.05;
*, p ≤ 0.10
Data are from the 2014 Vietnam Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS)