Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 27;8:e47001. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47001

Table 3. Overlapping neural substrates for integration and recalibration.

Both neuro-behavioral models, VE and VAE (Equations 4/5), were tested within the clusters significantly contributing to the VAE effect (from Figure 3C, CVAE) and the two clusters contributing to the VE effect (from Figure 4, CTEMP, CPAR). The table lists regression betas and group-level t-values. The expected effects (based on Figure 3C and Figure 4) are shown in normal font, the effects of interest (cross-tested) in BOLD. We directly compared the effect strengths between clusters (one-sided paired t-test, p<0.05, FDR adjusted). Significant results are indicated by *. In particular, both CVAE and CPAR have significant VAE and VE effects (tcrit = 2.81, and their respective effect sizes do not differ between clusters (ns beta differences).

Model VAE ~ 1 + β*LDAA_AV + β*LDAV_AV VE ~ 1 + β*LDAA_AV + β*LDAV_AV
Cluster CVAE CTEMP CPAR CVAE CPAR
t-value
LDAA_AV)
−3.29
(−0.12)
−2.86
(−0.13)ns
−2.97
(−0.09)ns
−2.50
(−0.30)ns
−3.31
(−0.32)
t-value
LDAV_AV)
3.17
(0.12)
0.91
(0.03)*
2.23
(0.08)ns
6.61
(3.88)ns
6.93
(3.35)