Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 26;8:e47148. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47148

Table 1. Summary of studies investigating foveal spatial vision and sensitivity tasks in myopia.

Author Refractive error
range of myopic
cohort [D]
Functional tests Results for
myopes at foveal center
Suggested cause
Fiorentini and Maffei, 1976 −5.5 to −10 (n = 10) CSF Reduced CSF Neural insensitivity (myopic amblyopia)
Thorn et al., 1986 −6 to −9.75 (n = 13) CSF No difference in CSF Global expansion
Collins and Carney, 1990 −2 to −11
(n = 16)
VA, CSF No difference in VA or CSF between low and high myopic groups with contact lens correction NA
Strang et al., 1998 0 to −14 (n = 34) VA Reduced VA (MAR) with increasing myopia after
controlling for spectacle magnification
Retinal expansion specifically at the posterior pole; increased aberrations
Liou and Chiu, 2001 0 to >-12
(n = 105 eyes)
CSF Reduced CSF with increasing myopia Retinal stretching and disruption, neural insensitivity (myopic amblyopia)
Chui et al., 2005 −0.5 to −14 (n = 60) Grating resolution Decreased resolution acuity in cyc/mm Retinal expansion specifically at the posterior pole; global expansion along with ganglion cell loss
Coletta and Watson, 2006 +2 to −15 (n = 17) Interferometric grating resolution Decreased resolution acuity in cyc/mm but not in cyc/deg Retinal expansion specifically at the posterior pole
Atchison et al., 2006 +0.75 to −12.4 (n = 121) Spatial summation; interferometric grating resolution Increased critical summation area in linear area, but not in angular area;
Decreased resolution acuity in cyc/mm but not in cyc/deg
Retinal expansion specifically at the posterior pole; global expansion along with ganglion cell loss
Stoimenova, 2007 −1 to −8 (n = 60) Contrast thresholds of 20/120 letters Lower sensitivity to contrast for letters with a fixed angular size Morphologic changes in the retina
Rossi et al., 2007 −0.5 to −3.75 (n = 10) AO-corrected VA Reduced acuity (MAR) compared to emmetropes Retinal expansion, neural insensitivity; neural insensitivity (myopic amblyopia)
Jaworski et al., 2006 −8.5 to −11.5 (n = 10) Foveal summation thresholds; CSF Increased critical summation area (angular)
Decreased luminance sensitivity
Reduced contrast sensitivity at high frequencies (cyc/deg)
Reduction in photoreceptor sensitivity; postreceptoral changes; increased aberrations
Ehsaei et al., 2013 −2.00 to −9.62 (n = 60) Size threshold of high and low contrast letter targets No difference in threshold retinal image size between myopes
and emmetropes.
NA