Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Investig Med. 2019 Mar 2;67(6):987–994. doi: 10.1136/jim-2018-000966

Table 3.

Linear regression for the decline in eGFR in the entire cohort according to SMg quintiles (mg/dL)

Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
Model 5
β 95% CI P value β 95% CI P value β 95% CI P value β 95% CI P value β 95% CI P value
SMg quintiles
Q1 −0.93 −1.35 to 0.50 <0.001 −0.78 −1.22 to -0.34 <0.001 −0.71 −1.15 to-0.27 0.002 −0.54 −1.08 to-0.20 0.005 −0.50 −0.95 to-0.05 0.028
Q2 −0.41 −0.82 to 0.01 0.05 −0.27 −0.70 to 0.15 0.21 −0.24 −0.57 to 0.18 0.25 −0.21 −0.54 to 0.21 0.33 −0.15 −0.58 to 0.27 0.48
Q3 −0.2S −0.55 to 0.15 0.22 −0.18 0.50 to 0.23 0.39 − 0.18 −0.50 to 0.24 0.41 −0.15 −0.55 to 0.27 0.48 −0.12 −0.53 to 0.30 0.58
Q4 −0.27 −0.59 to 0.14 0.2 −0.20 −0.52 to 0.23 0.35 − 0.20 −0.53 to 0.22 0.35 −0.17 −0.59 to 0.25 0.44 −0.12 −0.54 to 0.30 0.58
Q5 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.

Model 1 was adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, body mass index at DHS-1.

Model 2 was adjusted for variables in model 1 plus serum phosphorus, calcium, bicarbonate, albumin, Intact parathyroid hormone, total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein at DHS-1.

Model 3 was adjusted for variables in model 2 plus use of diuretics, dietary supplements. ACEI and ARB at DHS-1.

Model 4 was adjusted for variables in model 3 plus prevalent hypertension and CRP at DHS-1.

Model 5 was adjusted for variables in model 4 plus prevalent type 2 diabetes at DHS-1.

β, change in eGFR In reference to the highest quintile of SMg levels. eGFR was calculated according to the MDRD study equation. ΔeGFR was calculated as eGFR at D HS-2 minus eGFR at DHS-1.

ACEI, ACE Inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blockers; CRP, C reactive protein; DHS, Dallas Heart Study; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SMg, serum magnesium.