Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jun 22;82(5):1660–1670. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27853

Table 3:

P-Values for Figure 5 (Image quality rating between different MRA-techniques)

    P-Value
 Method  Overall Angiogram  Pulmonary Arteries  Aorta  Non-vascular Structures
GD-cMRA vs. GD-UTE-MRA 0.12 <0.001*** <0.001*** <0.001***
GD-cMRA vs. FE-cMRA 0.089 0.006** 0.003** 0.015*
GD-cMRA vs. FE-UTE-MRA 0.53 0.506 0.79 <0.001***
GD-UTE-MRA vs. FE-cMRA 0.802 0.002** <0.001*** <0.001***
GD-UTE-MRA vs. FE-UTE-MRA 0.024* <0.001*** <0.001*** 0.008**
FE-cMRA vs. FE-UTE-MRA 0.059 0.005** 0.049* <0.001***
*

Asterisk mark significant differences, using Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test (p<0.05).

GD-cMRA: gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced conventional MRA, GD-UTE-MRA: gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced ultra-short echo time MRA, FE-cMRA: ferumoxytol enhanced conventional MRA, FE-UTE-MRA: ferumoxytol enhanced ultra-short echo time MRA.