Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2017 Dec 11;10(3-4):335–343. doi: 10.3233/PRM-170466

Table 2.

Distribution of NBD management techniques among patients with SB according to age in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry, 2009–15

Age group (% within each age group)
Overall patients (%)
(N = 5209)
5–11
(n = 1958)
12–19
(n = 1881)
20 and older
(n = 1370)
P-value
Bowel management*
 Oral medications 316 (6.1) 121 (6.2) 124 (6.6) 71 (5.2) 0.24
 Time evacuation 189 (3.6) 82 (4.2) 78 (4.1) 29 (2.1) 0.0023
 Suppository 247 (4.7) 121 (6.2) 85 (4.5) 41 (3.0) < 0.0001
 Standard enema 175 (3.4) 75 (3.8) 43 (2.3) 57 (4.2) 0.0047
 Cone enema 310 (6.0) 209 (10.7) 55 (2.9) 46 (3.4) < 0.0001
 Mini enema 164 (3.1) 103 (5.3) 48 (2.6) 13 (0.9) < 0.0001
 Antegrade enema 999 (19.3) 250 (12.8) 508 (27.2) 241 (17.7) < 0.0001
 Digital stimulation 158 (3.0) 50 (2.6) 48 (2.6) 60 (4.4) 0.0033
 Disimpaction 108 (2.1) 26 (1.3) 41 (2.2) 41 (3.0) 0.0038
 Other 67 (1.3) 18 (0.9) 20 (1.1) 29 (2.1) 0.0059
Bowel surgical history
 Antegrade colonic enema (Malone) channel creation 908 (17.4) 218 (11.1) 456 (24.2) 234 (17.1) < 0.0001
 Cecostomy button 268 (5.1) 68 (3.5) 124 (6.6) 76 (5.5) < 0.0001
 Cecostomy button closure 6 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 0 5 (0.4) 0.0058
 Colostomy 135 (2.6) 38 (1.9) 44 (2.3) 53 (3.9) 0.0018
 Ileostomy 15 (0.3) 9 (0.5) 4 (0.2) 2 (0.1) 0.1879
*

Totals do not equal 100% as some patients taking multiple medications or having multiple surgeries or forms of management.

Chi-square test.