Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 26;12:369. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3632-3

Table 3.

Results from clinical field study on efficacy of ProHeart® 12 against Dirofilaria immitis in dogs

Treatment group Study day Adult HW antigen test Microfilaria test Total no. of dogs Prevention rate
(Day 365)
Prevention rate
(Day 480)
Prevention rate
(Day 605)
Overall prevention rate
Negative Positive Negative Positive
No. of dogs % No. of dogs % No. of dogs % No. of dogs %
Heartgard® Plus (T01) 365 215 98.6 3 1.4 216 99.1 2 0.9 218a 98.6% (215 of 218) 99.5% (208 of 209) 100% (201 of 201) 98.2% (214 of 218)
480 208 99.5 1 0.5 208 99.5 1 0.5 209b
605 201 100 0 0 201 100 0 0 201
ProHeart® 12 (T02) 365 235 100 0 0 235 100 0 0 235 100% (235 of 235) 100% (226 of 226) 100 (222 of 222) 100%c (235 of 235)
480 226 100 0 0 226 100 0 0 226
605 222 100 0 0 222 100 0 0 222

aThree dogs (treated with Heartgard® Plus) were withdrawn after testing positive for adult HW antigen and/or microfilariae on Day 365

bOne dog (treated with Heartgard® Plus) was withdrawn after testing positive for adult HW antigen and/or microfilariae on Day 480

cProHeart® 12 significantly better than Heartgard® Plus (P = 0.0367)