Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Apr 9;102(9):1636–1643. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.012

Table 2.

Frequency of Participant-Clinician Communication and Documentation about Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) Symptoms (N = 159)

Assessment Characteristics Frequency (%)
CIPN Documentation (n = 73)
 - Non-Painful CIPN Documentationa 70 (96%)
 - Painful CIPN Documentationa 37 (51%)
 - Motor CIPN Documentationa 43 (59%)
Participant-Clinician Discussion of CIPN Symptoms (n = 70)
 - CIPN Discussion Initiated by Participant or Caregiverb 26 (37%)
 - CIPN Discussion Initiated by Clinicianb 44 (63%)
Participant Reported CIPN Symptoms (n = 44)
 - Non-Painful CIPN Symptom Intensity Discussionc 8 (18%)
 - Painful CIPN Symptom Intensity Discussionc 5 (11%)
 - Motor CIPN Symptom Discussionc 15 (34%)
 - Discuss at Least One Aspect of OPQRT (Onset, Provocation, Palliation, Quality, Location, Radiation, Time History)c 32 (73%)
 - Clinician Acknowledged Participant’s CIPN Reportc 7 (16%)
 - Clinician Acknowledged and Explored Participant’s CIPN Reportc 34 (77%)
 - Clinician Dismissed Participant’s CIPN Reportc 3 (7%)
a

Frequency (%) was calculated using the number of times CIPN was documented as the denominator (n = 73).

b

Frequency (%) was calculated using the number of times CIPN was discussed as the denominator (n = 70).

c

Frequency (%) was calculated using the number of times participants reported CIPN as the denominator (n = 44)