. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Feb 20;6(4):719–732. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00570-3

Appendix Table 1.

Comparison of Characteristics of Pharmacies within Five Miles, by Race and Poverty, Relationship Dynamics and Social Life (RDSL) study, Michigan, 2008–2009 (n=961 women, except where noted)

	Race			Poverty
	White (n=628)	African American (n=333)	Race Difference	Non-poor (n=705)	Poor (n=256)	Difference by Poverty
Access
Number of pharmacies within five miles	8.6	14.8	^***	9.6	13.9	^***
Hours open per week^a	78.2	72.6	^***	77.1	74.1	^***
Pharmacy type
% chain	50	37	^***	47	41	^***
% grocery/mass retail	31	21	^***	29	24	^**^a
% independent	19	42	^***	24	35	^***
Pharmacy Characteristics
*Ease of Access to Information*
% with any African-American pharmacists	2	10	^***	4	7	^***
% with any female pharmacists	50	35	^***	47	40	^***
% with patient education brochures about contraception^b	4	3		4	3
*Ease of Condom Purchase*
% with condoms on the shelf with other OTC products	83	62	^***	79	68	^***
% with self-check-out^c	10	6	^***	9	8

p<0.05,

^**

p<0.01,

^***

p<0.001 (two-tailed independent samples t-tests with 959 degrees of freedom).

One pharmacy was missing data on this variable, which was the nearest pharmacy for 4 women. N = 957 for this t-test.

One pharmacy was missing data on this variable, which was the nearest pharmacy for 11 women. N = 950 for this t-test.

One pharmacy was missing data on this variable, which was the nearest pharmacy for 17 women. N = 944 for this t-test.