Appendix Table 2.
Comparison of Characteristics of Nearest Pharmacy, by Race and Receipt of Public Assistance, Relationship Dynamics and Social Life (RDSL) study, Michigan, 2008–2009 (n=961 women, except where noted)
| Race × Poverty Interactions | Comparisons across Race × Poverty Intersections | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | African American | Poverty Differentials among: | Race Differentials among: | ||||||||||||
| Non-poor (n=514) | Poor (n=114) | Non-poor (n=191) | Poor (n=142) | White | AfricanAmerican | Non-poor | Poor | ||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | ||||||||
| Difference between columns: | |||||||||||||||
| (2) – (1) | (4) – (3) | (3) – (1) | (4) – (2) | ||||||||||||
| Access | |||||||||||||||
| Distance to nearest pharmacy (in miles) | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | −.9 | *** | .0 | −1.0 | *** | −.1 | |||||
| Hours open per weekb | 78.3 | 75.6 | 64.7 | 64.6 | −2.7 | −.1 | −13.6 | *** | −11 | *** | |||||
| Pharmacy type | |||||||||||||||
| % chain | 54 | 61 | 29 | 30 | 7 | 1 | −25 | *** | −31 | *** | |||||
| % grocery/mass retail | 30 | 20 | 10 | 13 | −10 | *a | 3 | −20 | *** | −7 | |||||
| % independent | 16 | 19 | 60 | 57 | 3 | −3 | 44 | *** | 38 | *** | |||||
| Pharmacy Characteristics | |||||||||||||||
| Ease of Access to Information | |||||||||||||||
| % with any African-American pharmacists | 2 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 5 | *** | −4 | −7 | *** | −2 | |||||
| % with any female pharmacists | 51 | 46 | 20 | 13 | −5 | −7 | −31 | *** | −33 | *** | |||||
| % with patient education brochures about contraceptionc | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | −4 | *a | −3 | * | −2 | −1 | |||||
| Ease of Condom Purchase | |||||||||||||||
| % with condoms on the shelf with other OTC products | 86 | 82 | 47 | 51 | −4 | 4 | −39 | *** | −31 | *** | |||||
| % with self-check-outd | 9 | 8 | 3 | 4 | −1 | 1 | −6 | **a | −4 | ||||||
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001 (two-tailed independent samples t-tests with 959 degrees of freedom).
Test is no longer statistically significant when a Bonferroni correction is applied (“experiment-wide” α = .05, α’ = .0019).
One pharmacy was missing data on this variable, which was the nearest pharmacy for 4 women. N = 957 for this t-test.
One pharmacy was missing data on this variable, which was the nearest pharmacy for 11 women. N = 950 for this t-test.
One pharmacy was missing data on this variable, which was the nearest pharmacy for 17 women. N = 944 for this t-test.