Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2019 May 10;211:172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.04.024

Table 2.

Among youth who saw and did not see a healthcare provider, the mean level (SD) of protective social connectedness factors

Primary care Dental care Mental health care

Yes No t-test Yes No t-test Yes No t-test
Transgender/Gender Non-Conformi
 Parent connectedness 3.67 (0.92) 3.41 (0.97) 5.79, p<.001 3.66 (0.92) 3.33 (0.97) 6.98, p<.001 3.44 (0.93) 3.64 (0.95) 4.39, p<.001
 Non-parental adult connections 3.00 (1.09) 2.77 (1.09) 4.59, p<.001 2.97 (1.10) 2.77 (1.08) 3.51, p<.001 2.69 (1.01) 3.03 (1.12) 6.90, p<.001
 Teacher-student relationships 2.73 (0.59) 2.64 (0.65) 3.18, p=.009 2.70 (0.62) 2.67 (0.62) 0.83, p=.409 2.59 (0.61) 2.75 (0.61) 5.49, p<.001
 Friend connections 3.78 (1.17) 3.54 (1.23) 4.25, p<.001 3.76 (1.17) 3.51 (1.24) 4.13, p<.001 3.55 (1.27) 3.77 (1.15) 3.71, p<.001
Cisgender
 Parent connectedness 4.11 (0.83) 4.02 (0.89) 2.22, p=.027 4.15 (0.82) 3.85 (0.90) 6.09, p<.001 3.66 (0.92) 4.16 (0.81) 8.69, p<.001
 Non-parental adult connections 3.57 (1.00) 3.40 (1.04) 3.50, p<.001 3.60 (0.99) 3.23 (1.06) 6.69, p<.001 3.07 (0.99) 3.59 (1.00) 8.02, p<.001
 Teacher-student relationships 2.83 (0.58) 2.76 (0.58) 2.60, p=.009 2.83 (0.57) 2.74 (0.58) 2.81, p=.005 2.64 (0.58) 2.84 (0.58) 5.47, p<.001
 Friend connections 3.99 (1.04) 3.85 (1.10) 2.68, p=.007 4.03 (1.01) 3.66 (1.17) 5.94, p<.001 3.62 (1.12) 4.00 (1.04) 5.61, p<.001

Note. Bolded results were significant at p < .10.

Ranges for parent connectedness, non-parental adult connections, and friend connections were 1–5; range for student-teacher relationships was 1–4.