Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 25;23(4):757–765. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01914-y

Table 4.

Evaluation of QL (SF-36, DAS24) in patients from the examined group

Sublay Onlay p
Pre RYGB SF-36 138 [146] (± 29) 136 [140] (± 29) 0.6
Pre RYGB SF-36 (physical) 81 [85] (± 15) 79 [82] (± 12) 0.43
Pre RYGB SF-36 (mental) 58 [66.5] (± 24) 57 [62] (± 11) 0.48
Pre IHR and abdominoplasty SF-36 48 [49] (± 12) 47 [49] (± 11) 0.72
Pre IHR and abdominoplasty SF-36 (physical) 29 [34] (± 12) 28 [30] (± 9) 0.31
Pre IHR and abdominoplasty (mental) 19 [19.5] (± 6) 19 [19] (± 5) 0.24
Post IHR and abdominoplasty SF-36 14 [12.5] (± 8) 16 [17] (± 8) 0.18
Post IHR and abdominoplasty SF-36 (physical) 5 [3] (± 3) 4 [4] (± 3) 0.57
Post IHR and abdominoplasty SF-36 (mental) 9 [9.5] (± 6) 12 [14] (± 5) 0.063
Pre RYGB DAS24 77.8 [80.5] (± 14) 73 [74] (± 14.5) 0.3
Pre IHR and abdominoplasty DAS24 45.1 [44.5] (± 7.22) 44 [44] (± 9) 0.63
Post IHR and abdominoplasty DAS24 24.1 [22.5] (± 5.8) 28 [26] (± 6) 0.026