Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 24;9(7):e028669. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028669

Table 1.

Refined CFIR constructs and key findings regarding HPV-positive women’s experiences with a referral-based cryotherapy treatment strategy

Construct Topics covered Key findings
Intervention characteristics
Relative advantage
  •  What are the advantages of the proposed treatment model?

  • Offered free of charge, outpatient

Adaptability
  •  What are other models of treatment that would facilitate increased access?

  •  What are factors of the current treatment model that could be improved?

  • Decentralised treatment or transportation support would improve the model

Complexity
  •  Perceptions of treatment feasibility and sustainability

  •  What is the participant’s understanding of the screening and treatment cascade?

  • Women had unanswered questions after treatment regarding follow-up, need for medication or potential impact on fertility

Outer setting
Patient needs and resources
  •  What can the health facilities do to facilitate patient treatment acquisition?

  • Provider respect was high

Inner setting
Culture
  •  What is the level and impact of male support?

  •  How could community leader involvement facilitate treatment?

  • Male financial and moral support were important to treatment acquisition

  • Many were concerned about post-treatment abstinence or re-infection

  • Ambivalence about community leader involvement

Access to knowledge and information
  •  How can outreach and education strategies be improved?

  •  How does peer education and support impact treatment acquisition?

  • Peer education noted in both educating about screening and encouraging treatment

Characteristics of individuals
Knowledge and beliefs about the intervention
  •  Did women understand the meaning of a positive HPV result?

  •  Did women understand the process and availability of treatment?

  •  Do women understand the importance of treatment for their health?

  • Role of HPV in development of cancer was well understood, however some women equated an HPV-positive result with cancer

  • Women knew that early treatment would be simpler than treatment for advanced disease

Self-efficacy
  •  Do women prioritise accessing treatment for their health?

  •  How do health beliefs and self-efficacy impact women’s ability to overcome barriers to treatment?

  • Women felt knowing HPV status allowed them to move on a health action (treatment)

  • Treatment had an empowering influence

  • Post-treatment, women felt that they could/should be role models

Individual stage of change
  •  What role do peer networks or social support play in treatment access?

  •  What role do individual health beliefs play in reactions or decisions about treatment for a positive HPV test?

  • Women felt relief at knowing HPV status

  • Fear surrounding HPV result and association with cancer led to some inaction

CFIR, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.