Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 19;9(7):e023829. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023829

Table 4.

Association between anthropometric changes and incidence rate of diabetes by sex: results from Cox regression*

Women Men Risk Diff.
HR † 95% CI HR † 95% CI RD † 95%  CI P value
Per absolute changes
∆Weight n=12 330 (Power=0.99) n=7298 (Power=0.89) n=19 628 (Power=1.00)
 per SD gain 1.13 1.08 to 1.19 1.20 1.14 to 1.27 0.07 −0.02 to 0.14 0.32
∆BMI n=12 324 (Power=0.99) n=7292 (Power=0.89) n=19 616 (Power=1.00)
 per SD gain 1.14 1.08 to 1.19 1.23 1.15 to 1.31 0.08 −0.03 to 0.17 0.10
∆WC n=12 311 (Power=0.99) n=7283 (Power=0.89) n=19 594 (Power=1.00)
 per SD gain 1.18 1.12 to 1.24 1.25 1.18 to 1.34 0.07 −0.02 to 0.15 0.26
∆WHR ‡ n=12 287 (Power=0.99) n=7226 (Power=0.88) n=19 513 (Power=1.00)
 per SD gain 1.08 1.05 to 1.11 1.17 1.11 to 1.22 0.09 0.03 to 0.13 0.006
Per relative changes
∆Weight‡ n=12 330 (Power=0.99) n=7298 (Power=0.89) n=19 628 (Power=1.00)
 per 5% gain 1.14 1.08 to 1.19 1.23 1.17 to 1.32 0.09 0.01 to 0.18 0.08
∆BMI n=12 324 (Power=0.99) n=7292 (Power=0.89) n=19 616
 per 5% gain 1.14 1.08 to 1.20 1.21 1.14 to 1.28 0.07 −0.02 to 0.15 0.17
∆WC n=12 311 (Power=0.99) n=7283 (Power=0.89) n=19 594 (Power=1.00)
 per 5% gain 1.20 1.14 to 1.27 1.28 1.19 to 1.37 0.08 −0.02 to 0.16 0.26
∆WHR‡ n=12 287 (Power=0.99) n=7226 (Power=0.88) n=19 513 (Power=1.00)
 per 5% gain 1.09 1.06 to 1.13 1.19 1.13 to 1.27 0.10 0.03 to 0.17 0.009
By categories
∆Weight n=12 330 (Power=0.99) n=7298 (Power=0.89) n=19 628 (Power=1.00)
 >5% loss 0.69 0.54 to 0.88 0.63 0.46 to 0.86 −0.06 −0.38 to 0.35 0.90
 ±5% Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. -
 >5% gain 1.34 1.09 to 1.64 1.54 1.25 to 1.91 0.20 −0.13 to 0.54 0.50
∆BMI n=12 324 (Power=0.99) n=7292 (Power=0.89) n=19 616 (Power=1.00)
 >5% loss 0.69 0.54 to 0.88 0.70 0.52 to 0.93 0.10 −0.30 to 0.47 0.74
 ±5% Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. -
 >5% gain 1.30 1.07 to 1.60 1.58 1.29 to 1.95 0.28 −0.08 to 0.61 0.18
∆WC n=12 311 (Power=0.99) n=7283 (Power=0.89) n=19 594 (Power=1.00)
 >5% loss 0.67 0.52 to 0.87 0.52 0.39 to 0.71 −0.15 −0.47 to 0.15 0.24
 ±5% Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. -
 >5% gain 1.46 1.21 to 1.77 1.41 1.13 to 1.76 −0.05 −0.28 to 0.27 0.71
∆WHR n=12 287 (Power=0.99) n=7226 (Power=0.88) n=19 513 (Power=1.00)
 >5% loss 0.72 0.54 to 0.96 0.53 0.40 to 0.71 −0.18 −0.50 to 0.09 0.20
 ±5% Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 >5% gain 1.50 1.22 to 1.84 1.44 1.13 to 1.83 −0.06 −0.31 to 0.29 0.74

*The study power was calculated based on the reported number of participants in each analyses to detect a HR of 1.1 or greater in Cox regression analyses, with the assumption that the overall event rate (diabetes) is 5.0 per 1000 person-year.

†HR and RD were estimated using the Cox regression with anthropometric changes from baseline to either 2004 or 2008 as time-varying exposure (independent) variable and incidence of diabetes as outcome (dependent) variable, after accounting for age, ethnicity, household income, initial anthropometrics, smoking status, physical activity, HEI 2005 Canada tertiles (low/medium/high), parental history of diabetes, and baseline comorbidities (0/1/≥2).

‡The difference between men and women was statistically significant with p<0.01 in Wald’s test of the interaction of the association of anthropometric changes with sex in Cox regression models.

BMI, body mass index; HEI, Healthy Eating Index; RD, risk difference; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-hip-ratio.